Posts Tagged ‘Palm Beach County Attorney’

Number TWO of the Six Major Points Series

July 2011

Here is Number Two of the Six Major Points Series

I handle corporate workouts, reorganizations and dissolutions and other types of disputes among co-owners of privately owned companies, in other words I advise clients when they are experiencing adverse business situations.

But what does it really mean to be a business lawyer handling dissolution and other types of disputes among co-owners or adverse business situations? Does it require a special temperament and skill set? Here’s my take on the answers to these questions:

It Means understanding business and the relationships that make it work.

This is the Second of the SIX Six Major Points Series


Number TWO of the Six Major Points Series

It Means Knowing Your Client’s Business. Every closely held business is different. Some operate on a partnership model with diffuse authority and little or no formality in regard to decision making. Written agreement among the owners may be non-existent. Others may have detailed written agreement calling for hierarchical management, and still act like a cadre of co-equals, others may have a hierarchical management structure that is rigorously followed. The business lawyer also must discern who holds what leverage in the company’s business. For example, one owner may control relations with the company’s key customers, which may have significant implications in terms of who’s in a position to buy out whom. One owner may have personal financial resources the other lacks, or may personally own the real estate housing the company’s business. The point is, as a business lawyer you need to understand how the business at hand operates, not just on paper but in practice, and you need to understand how the business operation affects your client’s ability to prosecute or defend claims of shareholder oppression, deadlock or financial impropriety, and how it influences the range of possible outcomes.

If you missed any please check out my other blog postings

Sidney Turner

www.SidneyTurnerllc.com

 

Share

Number ONE of the Six Major Points Series

July 2011

People have asked me to explain what I do and what it means.

I handle corporate workouts, reorganizations and dissolutions and other types of disputes among co-owners of privately owned companies, in other words I advise clients when they are experiencing adverse business situations.

But what does it really mean to be a business lawyer handling dissolution and other types of disputes among co-owners or adverse business situations? Does it require a special temperament and skill set? Here’s my take on the answers to these questions:

It Means understanding business and the relationships that make it work.

There are Six Major Points Series I will cover over the next few blogs. Starting with

 

Number ONE of the Six Major Points Series

It Means supporting the Client through this difficult time. It’s called adverse business situation for a reason. A relationship is being torn asunder in the breakup of a business partnership. It’s not just about money. It’s about the inter-personal grievances, resentments, antagonisms, affections, disappointments, jealousies, and innumerable other emotions that attach to people with close relationships whose common interests have diverged to a critical point. The emotions can run even higher when it’s a family-owned business. The client’s need for support and guidance, on top of the uncertainties surrounding the future of the business in which the client’s self-identity is wrapped, puts a premium on the lawyer’s accessibility, empathy and ability to give on-the-spot advice and reassurance. These qualities in a business lawyer are particularly important because, business dissolution is highly dynamic. By that I mean, the now-adverse business partners, who often have to continue working together and make business decisions while simultaneously engaging in mutual mud-slinging, require constant input from legal counsel to assist with a daily stream of new issues.

If you missed any please check out my other blog postings

Sidney Turner

www.SidneyTurnerllc.com

 

Share

Does an unsigned offer letter and emails constitute a contract?

June 2011

 

The situation of an employee’s brief period of employment with the company, with a series of  informal discussions, email exchanges and an unsigned offer letter is not uncommon. Do they coalesce into an enforceable agreement giving the employee a desired 10% interest in the company?

Plaintiff and defendant were long-time acquaintances when plaintiff assisted defendant, in establishing a company. In 2008, after defendant thought he had lined up $10 million private equity financing, defendant recruited plaintiff for CEO of company.

After plaintiff began his services as CEO, he prepared and emailed to defendant an employment letter for himself with a three-year term and a 10% stake in the company. Defendant never signed the letter.

The investor backed out leaving the company with insufficient funds to pay plaintiff’s salary. Plaintiff leaves his job. Defendant sells company a few years later.

Plaintiff sued for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty, claiming that he was entitled to statutory notice of the sale transaction and a portion of the proceeds as 10% shareholder.

The court finds that defendant’s promise, if any, to grant plaintiff a 10% interest in company did not create a legally binding and enforceable contract because the alleged exchange or agreement lacks two essential elements of any contract, mutual assent to be bound and definiteness.

Sidney Turner

www.SidneyTurnerllc.com


 

Share

Scott Rothstein Using Money From Alleged Ponzi Scheme to Fund Payroll

November 2009

The South Florida Business Journal reported on Monday, November 23, 2009 that former Chairman Scott Rothstein of Broward County’s RRA law firm was using money from his alleged Ponzi scheme – $10 million in one year – to fund his payroll, according to the allegations laid out in an amended federal warrant request filed Monday by the acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida. This is in addition to the substantial charitable contributions to local charities including hospitals.

Charitable and campaign donations given through the Rothstein Family Foundation, including $800,000 to Joe DiMaggio Children’s Hospital, $1 million to Holy Cross Hospital, and $90,000 to the Republican Party of Florida, which was already turned over to the U.S. government.

These recipients of Rothstein’s largess, mostly in Fort Lauderdale and Broward County may be exposed to and subject to The Bankruptcy Trustee’s power to recover and recapture payments made that can be traced as proceeds from the ill gotten funds. Various theories of law may be applied to achieve this result similar to those being considered in the Madoff case. Please related article in The South Florida Business Journal.

Share