Posts Tagged ‘New York’

Number TWO of the Six Major Points Series

July 2011

Here is Number Two of the Six Major Points Series

I handle corporate workouts, reorganizations and dissolutions and other types of disputes among co-owners of privately owned companies, in other words I advise clients when they are experiencing adverse business situations.

But what does it really mean to be a business lawyer handling dissolution and other types of disputes among co-owners or adverse business situations? Does it require a special temperament and skill set? Here’s my take on the answers to these questions:

It Means understanding business and the relationships that make it work.

This is the Second of the SIX Six Major Points Series


Number TWO of the Six Major Points Series

It Means Knowing Your Client’s Business. Every closely held business is different. Some operate on a partnership model with diffuse authority and little or no formality in regard to decision making. Written agreement among the owners may be non-existent. Others may have detailed written agreement calling for hierarchical management, and still act like a cadre of co-equals, others may have a hierarchical management structure that is rigorously followed. The business lawyer also must discern who holds what leverage in the company’s business. For example, one owner may control relations with the company’s key customers, which may have significant implications in terms of who’s in a position to buy out whom. One owner may have personal financial resources the other lacks, or may personally own the real estate housing the company’s business. The point is, as a business lawyer you need to understand how the business at hand operates, not just on paper but in practice, and you need to understand how the business operation affects your client’s ability to prosecute or defend claims of shareholder oppression, deadlock or financial impropriety, and how it influences the range of possible outcomes.

If you missed any please check out my other blog postings

Sidney Turner

www.SidneyTurnerllc.com

 

Share

Number ONE of the Six Major Points Series

July 2011

People have asked me to explain what I do and what it means.

I handle corporate workouts, reorganizations and dissolutions and other types of disputes among co-owners of privately owned companies, in other words I advise clients when they are experiencing adverse business situations.

But what does it really mean to be a business lawyer handling dissolution and other types of disputes among co-owners or adverse business situations? Does it require a special temperament and skill set? Here’s my take on the answers to these questions:

It Means understanding business and the relationships that make it work.

There are Six Major Points Series I will cover over the next few blogs. Starting with

 

Number ONE of the Six Major Points Series

It Means supporting the Client through this difficult time. It’s called adverse business situation for a reason. A relationship is being torn asunder in the breakup of a business partnership. It’s not just about money. It’s about the inter-personal grievances, resentments, antagonisms, affections, disappointments, jealousies, and innumerable other emotions that attach to people with close relationships whose common interests have diverged to a critical point. The emotions can run even higher when it’s a family-owned business. The client’s need for support and guidance, on top of the uncertainties surrounding the future of the business in which the client’s self-identity is wrapped, puts a premium on the lawyer’s accessibility, empathy and ability to give on-the-spot advice and reassurance. These qualities in a business lawyer are particularly important because, business dissolution is highly dynamic. By that I mean, the now-adverse business partners, who often have to continue working together and make business decisions while simultaneously engaging in mutual mud-slinging, require constant input from legal counsel to assist with a daily stream of new issues.

If you missed any please check out my other blog postings

Sidney Turner

www.SidneyTurnerllc.com

 

Share

Do you know 363 Sales have increased?

July 2011

The surge in bankruptcies that occurred in 2008 and 2009 featured a greater number of 363 sales followed by liquidating plans than in prior bankruptcy cycles. A “363 sale” refers to the sale of any asset that is allowed by the bankruptcy court under Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Typically, the term is used to describe the sale of a majority of a business’s assets as an ongoing enterprise.

In a best-case scenario, a 363 sale might take a few weeks to execute, especially when a buyer is lined up prior to the filing and, because there are no realistic alternatives, no auction is held. Such was the scenario in both the General Motors and Chrysler Chapter 11 reorganizations. More likely, however, the process will take two to four months and sometimes longer.

Once the major assets are sold, the real work of the wind-down begins. The remaining assets are liquidated; the remainder of the company is wound down; secured creditors get their collateral (or more likely the cash equivalent of their collateral up to the value of their claims); and unsecured creditors’ claims are reviewed, valued, and then paid in full or in part, generally in accordance with the priority scheme in the Bankruptcy Code.

 

Sidney Turner

www.SidneyTurnerllc.com

 

Share

Do you know if you can make a required capital call?

May 2011

Do you know if you can make a required capital call?

If you’re the majority member of a Florida or New York limited liability company (LLC) and need more capital for your business, and either you have no written operating agreement (in Florida oral operating agreements are difficult to prove as to terms and substance), or you have one but it’s silent on the issue, You cannot make a compulsory capital call.


Without an operating agreement, or without an express provision for it an agreement expressly authorizing a call for additional capital contributions, that is the critical point, additional to the original capital contribution called for, and specifying the consequences of failing to make the contribution, you cannot make a compulsory capital call.

Sidney Turner

www.SidneyTurnerllc.com

Share

Email between attorneys can constitute a binding settlement

May 2011


Did you know that;

 

An email between attorneys, so long as it contains all the essential and material terms to the settlement, can constitute a binding settlement agreement notwithstanding one party later refused to sign the settlement paperwork.

 

 

Warrior Creek Development, Inc. v. Cummings, — So.3d —-, 2011 WL 1004691 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., is a strict liability statute, and a violating debt collector may escape liability only for “bona fide errors” which are unintentional notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid such errors. Whether the procedures are reasonable under the circumstances is a fact intensive inquiry that in each individual case.

Owen v. I.C. Systems, Inc., — F.3d —-, 2011 WL 43525 (11th Cir. 2011).

Sidney Turner

www.SidneyTurnerllc.com

 

Share

Trustee for Madoff Fraud to Distribute to Victims!

May 2011

The trustee appointed to unravel Bernard Madoff’s massive fraud is seeking to distribute recovered funds for the first time to the victims.

Trustee Irving Picard told a Manhattan bankruptcy court he is planning a $2.6 billion allocation, including an initial payout of $272 million.

Below is a link to an article in the Palm Beach Post

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/nation/ny-madoff-trustee-wants-to-start-paying-victims-1454512.html

 

Sidney Turner

www.SidneyTurnerllc.com


 

Share

Framework of an LLC Operating Agreement

March 2011

At the heart of an LLC is the “Operating Agreement,” a term that many entrepreneurs have heard but rarely appreciate the importance of. LLC’s are a hybrid combination of a partnership and a corporation. They are a creature of contract that allows for the unique circumstances that they were created to serve. Simply put, it is an agreement that can be structured to reflect the unique negotiations of “the deal”. The Operating Agreement provides flexibility to translate those deal terms into a business framework.

In most jurisdictions, the Operating Agreements is one of the few statutorily imposed requirements that a LLC mustobserve (Section 608.407 of the Florida LLC Act),  (Section 417 of the New York LLC Act). And while an LLC Act provides some default terms on how the LLC should operate, it is a limited generic baseline and in many instances may run contrary to the understanding of the partners. It is imperative for the members to take the time to have a properly crafted Operating Agreement to reflect their unique relationship.

The following is a summary breakdown of some of the most critical Operating Agreement provisions.

• Ownership Interests
• Purpose
• Allocation and Distribution of Profits and Losses
• Special Duties and Restrictions
• Voting Rights and Mechanics
• Managers
• Admission of New Members; Transfer of Membership
• Meetings
• Dissolution of the Company

One of the most overlooked functions of the Operating Agreement is to set forth the actual ownership interest that the members have in the LLC. This is commonly achieved by a “Schedule” attached to the Operating Agreement that lists the member names, the initial amount of capital they invested, the nature of the investment i.e. capital or labor and the percentage interest each member owns in the LLC. Unlike a corporation that has share certificates evidencing ownership, LLC’s can and often do rely on the schedule in the Operating Agreement to set forth the relative interests of the members.

Unlike a corporation, the equity a member has in the LLC and the amount of profits or losses that member is entitled to receive can be different. In contrast, in a corporation, a 50% shareholder would usually receive 50% of the profits of the corporation automatically. However, in an LLC, a member with a 50% Membership Interest could be configured to receive only 10% of the LLC’s profits/losses, which is something that can be specified in the Operating Agreement.

This allows for various creative structures to incentivize and facilitate a variety of deals.

The Operating Agreement may address the unique arrangements between the members or between the members and the LLC. For example, members may be obligated to work for the LLC on a full time basis (or the reverse, the members may be expressly permitted to work in and for other ventures). In addition, the Operating Agreement may provide for a member “Non-Compete” during and after membership in the LLC. Confidentiality and fiduciary obligations may also be required of the members during and after membership in the LLC. These provisions can all carry penalties for breach, including expulsion, reduction in membership interest, etc.

One of the core functions of an Operating Agreement is to set out the mechanics and restrictions for the transfer of equity member’s ownership interests. One of the common approaches is the so called “right of first refusal” which grants the LLC and other members the opportunity to match any offer obtained from any third party by a member wishing to sell his or her Membership Interest. In addition, the Operating Agreement can address so called “involuntary transfer” situations such as death, bankruptcy, disability or termination of employment by the company, as triggers that require a Member to sell, or the LLC to buy, a Membership Interest. In these situations, the Operating Agreement should also lay out a procedure and formula for determining valuation and buyout.

Summary. An Operating Agreement is an essential LLC component. In the short term, developing one will assist the partners in identifying and articulating their particular concerns. In the long term, an Operating Agreement will be the reference guide for many if not all of the scenarios that may impact the partners’ relationship.

Sidney Turner

www.SidneyTurnerLLC.com

Share

Issues related to LLC member responsibilities a growing legal challenge.

June 2010

We recently read on the legal blog New York Business Divorce two very interesting articles on cases involving LLC regulations in the state of Delaware and their possible impact on legislation in New York and Florida, two states which have often been influenced in this area of the law by developments in Delaware.

The first article is an examination of a schism between two LLC members who were forced to split control of the company under their operating agreement, despite an unequal distribution in ownership shares between them.

The second article is a discussion of the legal and fiduciary duties of LLC members in regard to disclosing negotiations with outside entities for the sale of LLC assets prior to purchasing a co-member’s interests.

Share