1. To provide a “fresh start” for economically viable debtors;

2. To promote equality of distribution among similarly situated creditors;

3. To concentrate the activities of judgment creditors into a single court of broad and exclusive federal jurisdiction;

4. To provide “breathing space” to a debtor, permit a structured process outside of a quick liquidation to enhance asset values, and a determination by creditor classes of a “plan” for the distribution of the value of those assets.

When is Chapter 11 useful?

1. To provide an opportunity for financially troubled but economically viable company to restructure and continue operations, either under new ownership or a new financial structure, or by removing debt impediments to viability such as ruinous unsecured debt or disastrous contracts; or

2. To provide an orderly liquidation of a failed business that possesses assets that will have an enhanced value if sold for their “going concern” value or that need to be marketed through a special process, or that would benefit from the retention of current management and continuing operations throughout the liquidation process.

When is it not useful?

1. To postpone the death of an irretrievably failed business that lacks significant salvageable assets;

2. To halt a foreclosure entirely upon speculative hope that something will turn up in a few weeks;

3. To escape the oppressive terms of a secured lender with a blanket lien on all business assets (except in a few rare instances);

4. When a consensual workout or an assignment for the benefit of creditors in state court would work and is the less costly alternative.

Use of bankruptcy as a sales vehicle

1. Under § 363 (f) of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor may sell property of the bankruptcy estate free and clear of liens, claims and encumbrances, subject to certain restrictions. This allows debtor to make assets more marketable by severing third party claims and cleaning title.

2. Under certain conditions, a bankruptcy court can also, pursuant to § 363 (f), permit the debtor to sell property for which the debtor holds only a partial interest or where the debtor’s interests are contested by a third party.

II. First Steps in a Chapter 11 Case

Petition and Initial Filings

A chapter 11 case is commenced by filing a petition. The petition consists of an official form (or a document that substantially conforms to the official form) that requires the debtor to estimate the amount of its assets and liabilities. The required initial filings also include a list o the top 20 creditors and their addresses, parties with whom the debtor has executory (existing) contracts and leases, a corporate resolution authorizing the filing (if the debtor is a corporation) and an attorney’s verified statement disclosing the attorney’s fee arrangement.  A matrix of creditor addresses is also often required under the bankruptcy jurisdiction’s local rules.

Often filed initially, however, not required to be, are the schedules listing all secured and unsecured creditors, their potential claims, and the debtor’s assets and a list of equity security holders. Finally, a statement of financial affairs (called the “SOFA”) is required to be filed, a form document of some length that provides for a more detailed view of the debtor’s finances and situation regarding such things as litigation and property transfers pre-petition.

“First Day Motions”

Because the bankruptcy process initiated by the bankruptcy petition places the debtor under court supervision and restricts its ability to operate its business, a debtor must in the first instance obtain court permission to operate realistically. So-called “first day motions” are not necessarily filed the first day, but with an operating business they are often required to be filed and heard by the bankruptcy court as soon as possible, if not, in fact, the first day. Typical first day motions include:

 1. Employee Wages

2. Cash Collateral

3. Debtor in Possession (”DIP”) Financing

4. Retention Motions

5. Utilities

III. Small Business Debtor v. Non-Small Business Debtor

A small business bankruptcy case is a chapter 11 case involving a small business debtor, whom the Bankruptcy Code defines as a person engaged in commercial or business activities other than owning or operating real estate with debt no greater than (as of December 28, 2009) $2.19 million, not including debt to insiders and affiliates.

All chapter 11 debtors must attend meetings and timely file schedules and tax returns and allow the UST to inspect its books, but the 2005 amendments to the Bankruptcy Code added other obligations for the small business debtor. One theme of the small business amendments is that creditors deserve more and better information, presented in understandable and recognizable formats. Many sections of the small business amendments were framed with this goal in mind. As a result, small business debtors must file balance sheets, income statements, and cash flow statements with the petition, or state under penalty of perjury that none exist.

Small business debtors can receive only a 30 day extension of its time to file schedules and statement of financial affairs. In a small business case, the United States Trustee is required to conduct an initial interview with the small business debtor before the Section 341 meeting. Senior management and counsel are required to the initial debtor interview, as well as scheduling conferences and meetings of creditors.

IV. Leases and Executory Contracts

1. Leases

Section 365(d) (4) requires a debtor to assume or reject a lease of non-residential real property within 120 days of the petition date or the lease will be rejected. The court upon motion may extend the deadline an additional 90 days. No additional extension is permitted accept with the written approval of the landlord. The deadline may force a debtor to make premature decisions as to its future needs related to subject real estate, since, not atypically, a Chapter 11 debtor may not have its financing in place or its plan formulated (particularly if it turns on settlement of litigation) by the 210 day deadline.

In large retail cases, where there may be dozens of leases and sites to analyze, this requirement may be particularly burdensome. Leases may be rejected, assumed, or assumed and assigned, in accordance with the rules discussed below for executory contracts.

2. Executory Contracts

Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code provides a debtor with authority to assume or reject an executory contract subject to court approval. In re Carlisle Homes, Inc., 103 B.R. 524, 534 (Bankr. D. N.J. 1988) the court explained: The purpose of § 365 is, in part, to enable the debtor to take advantage of favorable agreements that benefit the estate. The Bankruptcy Code does not define “executory contract.” The legislative history of § 365, however, is instructive as to the meaning of the term in the bankruptcy context. An executory contract is one on which performance remains due to some extent on both sides.

Upon rejection, the debtor must pay “rejection damages”, consisting of damages for breach of the contract, however, despite the fact the contract is rejected after the filing of the bankruptcy petition, the claim is as a general unsecured pre-petition claim and thus subjected to the limitations of any pro rata distributions to unsecured creditors. A debtor may also assume a favorable contract, and obligate itself to pay a “cure amount” and provide adequate assurance of future performance. Cure amounts are paid in full amount as a current obligation.

With some exceptions, a debtor may also assume and assign (i.e. sell) a favorable contract to a third party, subject to court approval. In such instances, the third party pays the cure amount and provides the adequate assurance of future performance. With both executory contracts and leases, upon assumption, the debtor is required to meet post-assumption obligations under those contracts and leases as those obligations come due.

But the grass needs to be cut, and you need to pay the lifeguards at the pool, etc. If all the homeowners decided they didn’t need to pay their HOA dues, every homeowner would lose access to the pool, would have to put up with overgrown weeds and the accompanying pests and other problems.

Our biggest losses come from homeowners filing bankruptcy, because HOA dues are forgiven by that process, as are liens on the house. Otherwise, we can collect when the house is sold.

The question becomes what to do when a homeowner abuses the process and stays in a home and does not pay, forcing the remaining homeowners to support him.

We have recently succeeded in assisting a HOA with a recalcitrant homeowner who had filed bankruptcy and wanted to stay without paying past, present or future payments as the foreclosing lender was not actively pursuing its foreclosure action.
For more information please visit us at http://www.sidneyturnerllc.com/and this article at http://www.palmbeachpost.com/money/real-estate/west-palm-beach-country-club-feels-the-sting-120574.html

Some homeowners in the struggling economy who have found that falling real estate prices have brought the value of their homes lower than the mortgage debt that they owe on their property, known as “underwater” mortgages, have responded to this unusual situation by simply trying to cancel their mortgages and move into more affordable homes.

Many of the debtors who choose to default on home mortgages don’t seem to consider or even realize many of the consequences of this action, especially that they are still responsible for paying the balance of their mortgage even in cases of default and that they cannot simply walk away from their obligations. They are liable to legal action from their creditors if they do not make their payments while actually having fewer legal options than some other debtors.

The threat of legal action is only one of several possible ramifications debtors face for voluntarily defaulting on a mortgage; other adverse affects include ruining their credit and facing the possibility of being forced into filing for bankruptcy to escape their obligations. If you would like to learn more about the issues related to “underwater” mortgages and homeowner’s options please refer to http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125902556993561567.html and if you have any questions or want additional information please visit us at Sidney Turner, LLC.

It is reported that the federal government seized eight properties. Other creditors are lining up to get, obtain liens, replevin property or recover property as not having been properly transferred. The race to the court was on.

A bankruptcy would stay and remove all civil legal action against the firm to the federal jurisdiction of a bankruptcy court. A Broward County Circuit Court judge appointed a receiver last week, to oversee the firm’s finances. The petitioning investors in the bankruptcy are also seeking emergency appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee because of a “continuing risk of loss, concealment, dissipation and/or destruction” of RRA’s property.

The bankruptcy court will be able to centralize all of the asset recovery efforts and manage the equitable distribution of the estate assets. Please see article in the South Florida Business Journal, Wednesday, November 11, 2009,

Borrowers are getting the opportunity to turn the tables on bank creditors. The recent financial engineering and resulting financial instruments required by the securitization of mortgages has created a defense to the lenders attempting to foreclose on those defaulting borrowers.

On Oct. 9 in federal bankruptcy court in the Southern District of New York. A judge ruled that a alleged lender, PHH Mortgage, hadn’t proved its claim to a delinquent borrower’s home in White Plains, Judge Robert D. Drain wiped out a $461,263 mortgage debt on the property. That’s right: the mortgage debt disappeared, via a court order. If the lender can’t come forward with proof of ownership, then borrowers may have a stronger argument in court and, may even be able to stay in their homes mortgage-free.

Securitizations allowed for large pools of bank loans to be bundled and sold to legions of investors, but some of the nuts and bolts of the mortgage game — notes, for example — were never adequately tracked or recorded during the boom. In some cases, that means nobody truly knows who owns what. Click here to learn more.